conversation about maximising value from customer insight

Are your customers thinking fast and slow? Irrational advice

Thinking Fast and SlowIt hardly feels like I need to write a review on this book, as I often hear to recommended at conferences. However, chatting to a few peers in customer insight leadership roles, I realise that many of you have still not read this classic or have stalled part way through reading. So, I hope this helps motivate you.

The first point to admit is this is not as easy a read on Behavioural Economics (BE) as more approachable writing styles like “Nudge” by Richard Thaler. You do get used to the style through the book but there are a couple of things that make it harder for the business reader, the depth of theory that is covered and the amount of case studies (which provider an insiders view of challenging accepted wisdom within academia). I also found that after having read ‘Nudge’ I was initially a little frustrated that this book is not structured around a simple list of biases. It appears to be deliberate as Daniel Kahneman wants you to understand the principles not just pick up some buzzwords.

That said, this is well worth reading. From the initial explanation of System 1 and System 2, through the evidence provided on multiple biases, to how poorly basic statistics and logic are applied in our decision making; this book has much to share. The deliberately more narrative style of the book also does reward the persistent reader, as you begin to see how models and principles interact and build on each other (like loss aversion and framing).

The other advice I would give if that this is a good guide to the pitfalls to beware of when making decisions or seeking to influence key decisions in your company. In that regard it goes much wider than just a textbook on Behavioural Economics. For instance the evidence Daniel shows of a failure to regress to the mean in forecasting is often beyond the scope of popular BE but very relevant.

I would recommend any Customer Insight leader to read this work. This is particularly important for those working within Financial Services, where your regulator requires consideration of how consumers really make decisions and where your research team can help your analysts with interpretation.

Event: B2B customer insight

Cutty SarkLeading insight for a major life & pensions provider for many years, you become painfully aware of the added difficulty in reaching strong insights on B2B customers. Although at first B2B insight can just appear less developed as a market, with a much smaller quality data provider market and still more of a focus on sales management and brand (almost where B2C was 5-10 years ago); on reflection this is not the case.

It is more challenging to develop as robust analysis (mainly due to data challenges driven by both less capture and matching challenges) and more challenging to interpret robust research (mainly due to multiple relationships and opaque decision making hierarchies/influences). However, on closer inspection, some of the challenges being attempted for B2B insight are both more challenging and able to create a bigger commercial impact if achieved.

So, I was pleased to see a tweet & blog post from Peter Lavers and the team at Customer Attuned on the lessons that B2B and B2C insight can learn from each other.

Earlier this year I attended an event run by them entitled “The Great Debate” (part of a series of such events), with this one being held at Greenwich. I was reticent to write too much on my thoughts from this; as it is a Chatham House rules meeting. However, Peter has usefully shared the key anonymised lessons learnt on his blog. The above link is well worth reading.

Any other thoughts from those who like me have had the challenge of both B2B and B2C insight? Did others also find the approach to NPS needed to be tweaked? Do reply with your comments.

Event: More Behavioural Economics at a Cricket Ground

Following my presentation at Edgbaston, last week I also presented at the Gloucestershire County Cricket ground in Bristol. Clearly the CII favour the view over a green for their regional market forums. Anyway, it was another opportunity to share my thoughts on Behavioural Economics and why it matters for Insurers. Another positive response and good engagement from a mixture of insurers, brokers and related agencies; which promises well for this industry engaging with the FCA’s challenges in this area.

To help spread the word further, below I share the presentation that I used:

Happy to offer training or consultancy to companies wanting to engage with this challenge. To my mind expertise in this area is a natural and needed fit with customer insight teams within Financial Services.

Infographics

I believe in the importance of data visualisation, both because most people can more readily understand a visual representation than tables of numbers and because it is a useful language with which to communicate not just analysis but story. In other words, the challenge to appropriately visualise data or analysis, encourages the analyst to get closer to insights.

Anyway, I’ll blog more on that wider topic another time, for now I just wanted to share links to two agencies whose work on infographics have impressed me. If you’ve not come across them before, see if these spark any creative ideas…

Home logo

There is always a risk that fashion obscures function, so I am aware of the risk that some people now equate data visualisation with infographics, which would also be a mistake in my book. So, as promised, more on data visualisation to following a later post, with the obligatory reference to Edward Tufte.

For now, please do feedback with your experience of infographics. Any tips?

Event: CII Regional Market Forum

Good to present at this event on the relevance of Behavioural Economics to the Insurance industry. I’m used to presenting on this theme to marketers but it was interesting to engage with underwriters, brokers and other insurance professionals.

CII Regional Market Forum

 

The follow-up to this will be an article I’ve written, entitled “Why Behavioural Economics matters for Insurers“, to be published in July’s CII Journal.

Plus it afforded us all a fine view of the grass at Edgbaston:

Edgbaston

 

 

Customer Insight, what do you think of this for definition?

iStock photoMany terms in the lexicon of marketing and business are ambiguous at best, misleading at worst. Both old terms like ‘proposition’ and new ones like ‘big data’ seem to bring more smoke than light. But the lack of clarity that has troubled me most in corporate life is the many meanings of ‘customer insight’.

I have come across companies that mean data analytics, those that mean consumer research, some which still mean deeply held beliefs by the marketing leader and only a few which mean something more complete.

From my experience, genuinely producing customer insights does require the outputs of data experts, statistical analysts, experienced researchers and commercially minded database marketing analysts, but it is more than that. Akin to Aristotle’s “the whole is greater than the sum of its parts“, I see real customer insights as being developed based on a convergence of the above evidence.

It’s always difficult to come to a precise definition which is not too verbose, but a working version for me at the moment is as follows… (more…)

Poll: Customer Insight, the forgotten leader?

Joseph BeuysWhilst leading the largest customer insight function amongst UK insurers, I was struck how poorly served CI leaders are; in terms of coaching or consultancy support. Compared to my peers in Marketing or Operations, this looks like a real gap in the market.

Sure, there was technical training for members of an insight team; be that in analytical software, SQL coding, statistics, data management or research methods. Plus, yes, there is a wealth of general management or leadership support available; from softer skills training courses to executive coaching at the other end of the spectrum. However, the gap I’m referring to is the “filling in that sandwich”. The art and science to effectively use the range of technical insight skills in concert and in a way that drives action (to both improve customer experience & to make money).

So, why the gap? Well, as far as I can tell the audience is not well understood. There does not appear to be an agreed common definition of Customer Insight; for example some companies use this term to refer to research, some to analysis and few to the combination. But I wonder if it is also because it is only fairly recently that customer insight leaders have risen to greater seniority and influence within companies. Few of this brave band have since moved on to consultancy and training, so a practitioners perspective is rarely available as an offering.

I’d be interested in hearing existing customer insight leaders thoughts on this: